Our obsession with dividends

November 19

Dividends were a major topic of conversation at Hellaby Holdings’ annual meeting as they are at most shareholder meetings.  Hellaby’ s dividend payments have been under scrutiny for a number of years because the Shareholders’ Association has accused it of borrowing to make these distributions and the company has paid tax in advance to ensure that all payments were fully imputed.

As the following table shows, dividend payments have exceeded the net operating cash flow for the group and parent company in each of the past three years. No final dividend was paid for the June 2007 year.

Hellaby Holdings: Operating cash flow and dividends ($000)

Net operating cash flow 

 

Group

Parent Company 

Dividends paid 

 2007

 7,884

 5,573

 10,742

 2006

 13,453

 12,199

 15,914

 2005

 13,236

 300

 18,695

 2004

 17,614

 (1,653)

 15,251

 2003

 18,869

 5,173

 10,344

 Total

 71,056

 21,592

 70,946

The parent company figures are relevant for Hellaby because it is a passive investor with interests in fully owned or majority controlled companies that are consolidated.  Chairman Bill Falconer told shareholders on Friday that Hellaby had established “a dividend policy with a target of distributing 50 per cent of tax paid profit” and it “will not be paying tax in advance in order to generate imputation credits”.

During question time Falconer said that he believed that Hellaby was a dividend stock. In a straw poll he asked shareholders to raise their hands if they wanted to receive a dividend, even if it was not fully imputed, or if they would prefer to wait until distributions were fully tax free.  The response was 50/50 but two directors, Hugh Green and Bob Carter, raised their hands in support of the payment of unimputed distributions. Their response was important because Green owns 30.8% of Hellaby and Carter is an associate of his.

This obsession with dividends is apparent at most meetings. Even at high-growth companies Rakon and Wellington Drive Technologies directors were asked about the prospects of an initial distribution.

New Zealand shareholders put far too much emphasis on dividends. Investors should be willing to invest in fast growing companies that re-invest all of their earnings back in the business as well as those with high dividend yields.
       
Brian Gaynor, 19 November 2007

The Milford KiwiSaver Plan has two KiwiSaver Funds available to New Zealand investors: The Milford Aggressive KiwiSaver Fund and The Milford Balanced KiwiSaver Fund. Click here to switch to Milford.

We have four PIE registered Funds: The Milford Balanced Fund, The Milford Aggressive Fund, The Milford Peak Fund and The Milford Income Fund.

Individually Managed Accounts (IMAs) are portfolios of investments tailored to clients risk profiles and requirements for growth, income and capital preservation.


UNIT PRICES:

KiwiSaver Funds  
Aggressive Fund 1.3165
Balanced Fund 0.9780
PIE Funds  
Aggressive Fund 1.3165
Peak Fund 1.0630
Balanced Fund 0.9780
Income Fund 1.0195

Unit Prices as at 29 July 2010

LATEST NEWS:

Head of Business Development Appointed

Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Milford Asset Management (Milford) is...

Get your free regular insight into economics, finance and investments.